Stanislaus County Superior Court
Home  |  Tentative Rulings  |  Court Calendar  |  Jury Service  |  Forms  |  Español Search  Click to Search
Services & Resources

Appeals
Civil
Court Interpreters
Criminal
Family Law
Juvenile
Probate
Self Help
Small Claims
Traffic
Court Information

ADR Information
Case Index Lookup
Contact/Locations
Operating Hours
OnLine Options
Employment
Fee Schedule
General Information
Grand Jury
History
Holidays
Media
Press Releases
Public Information
Related Links
Vendor Resources
Rules of Court
Videos

Family Law Tentative Ruling Announcement

Family Law Tentative Ruling Announcement

Date:  September 18, 2014

If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order.

However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Clerk’s office and opposing counsel of your intent before 4:00 p.m. TODAY.

When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. If requesting a hearing for clarification of tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification.

You may request a hearing by calling: (209) 530-3107 prior to 4 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing at
FAMLAW.TENTATIVES@stanct.org Email requests must be made prior to 4pm AND confirmed by return e-mail. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3107 to request your hearing.


The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Robert B. Westbrook in Department #9:

THERE ARE NO TENTATIVE RULINGS.


The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Joseph R. Distaso in Department #13:

695093 - HACKER VS. HACKER

 

Respondent’s Request for Order Enforcing Judgment – HEARING REQUIRED.  A review of the Court’s file shows Pleadings on Joinder for several pension/retirement plans.  Respondent does not indicate whether these are the plans for which he is attempting to prepare QDROs or whether there are additional plans for which he is attempting to obtain information from Petitioner.  The parties’ Stipulated Judgment contains a generic cooperation provision, but it does not contain any provision expressly requiring either party to exchange plan statements.  Respondent should be prepared to discuss which pension/retirement plans are at issue.  

 

687037 - SILVA VS. SILVA

 

Petitioner’s Request for Order Appointing Elisor and Other Requests for Relief – HEARING REQUIRED.


The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Jack M. Jacobson in Department #14:

THERE ARE NO TENTATIVE RULINGS.


The following are the tentative ruling cases calendared before Judge Loretta Murphy Begen in Department #25:

687525 - HERNANDEZ VS. HERNANDEZ

 

Petitioner’s Request for Order Bifurcating Issue of Marital Status – GRANTED.  Petitioner is instructed to prepare a Status-Only Judgment for the Court’s review.

 

692086 - JENNINGS VS. JENNINGS

 

Respondent’s Request for Order Compelling Discovery Responses – DENIED without prejudice.  Although Respondent captions her Request for Order as one seeking to “compel responses” to her Production Requests, it is actually a Request for Order seeking to compel further responses.  Accordingly Rule 3.1345 required Respondent to file a Separate Statement of Issues in Dispute.  Respondent failed to do so.

 

The parties shall appear for HEARING on Respondent’s request for Spousal Support.


 

 

 

 

Last Updated: 09/17/2014 10:59:08 AM

Related Information:
Civil_Tentative_Rulings
Disclaimer  |  Privacy Statement  |  Feedback
Copyright © 2014 Stanislaus County Superior Court. All Rights Reserved.